Stoler v. PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
||Jessica A. Stoler
||PennyMac Loan Services, LLC
||June 1, 2018
||US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
||John T. Copenhaver
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|October 11, 2019
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part as more fully set forth herein defendant's 49 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 10/11/2019. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (tmr)
|February 19, 2019
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 4 Motion by PennyMac Loan Services, LLC to Dismiss; directing that defendant's motion to dismiss is denied with respect to plaintiff's WVCCPA claims (Count I); and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted with respect to plaintiff's negligence claim (Count II), tortious interference with contract claim (Count III), and estoppel claim (Count IV). Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 2/19/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
|December 6, 2018
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 11 MOTION by Jessica A. Stoler to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Kanawha County; pursuant to this court's 15 order of 7/20/2018, staying the briefing on the pending motion to dismiss, that briefing is no longer stayed, and PennyMac has until 12/20/2018 to file its reply in support of its 4 motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 12/6/2018. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (taq)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?