Reynolds v. Encompass Health Corporation et al
Sherry Reynolds |
Encompass Health Corporation, Pam Douglas and Freda McVay |
2:2019cv00038 |
January 11, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Thomas E Johnston |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER granting #9 Motion to Suspend the Scheduling Order and Stay Briefing the Motion to Dismiss Defendants McVay and Douglas; briefing on the Motion to Dismiss is STAYED and the Court will defer entering a scheduling order until the Court has decided the Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 2/14/2019. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kp) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE by Pam Douglas, Encompass Health Corporation, Freda McVay in opposition to #9 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Suspend the Scheduling Order and Stay Briefing re: #3 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Wood County. (Walling, Sarah) (Modified on 2/8/2019 to remove link to #10 memorandum) (kp). |
Filing 12 REPLY by Sherry Reynolds to #11 Response In Opposition. (Auvil, Walt) (Modified on 2/5/2019 to remove links to #3 motion and #4 memorandum) (kp). |
Filing 11 RESPONSE by Pam Douglas, Encompass Health Corporation, Freda McVay in opposition to #9 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Suspend the Scheduling Order and Stay Briefing re: #3 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Wood County (Walling, Sarah) (Modified on 1/30/2019 to remove link to #10 memorandum) (kp). |
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM by Sherry Reynolds in support of #3 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Suspend the Scheduling Order and Stay Briefing re: #3 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Wood County (Auvil, Walt) (Modified on 1/24/2019 to remove links to #3 motion and #4 memorandum) (kp). |
Filing 9 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Suspend the Scheduling Order and Stay Briefing re: #3 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Wood County (Auvil, Walt) (Modified on 1/24/2019 to remove link to #4 memorandum) (kp). |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Pam Douglas, Freda McVay in support of #7 MOTION by Pam Douglas, Freda McVay to Dismiss Complaint. (Walling, Sarah) |
Filing 7 MOTION by Pam Douglas, Freda McVay to Dismiss Complaint Attached to #1 Notice of Removal. (Walling, Sarah) |
Filing 6 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand by Encompass Health Corporation. (Walling, Sarah) |
Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Encompass Health Corporation (Walling, Sarah) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by Sherry Reynolds in support of #3 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Wood County. (Auvil, Walt) (Modified on 1/16/2019 to remove link to #1 notice of removal) (kp). |
Filing 3 MOTION by Sherry Reynolds to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Wood County (Auvil, Walt) |
CASE assigned to Chief Judge Thomas E. Johnston. (klc) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (taq) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Encompass Health Corporation with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Wood County. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-7022217. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (taq) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.