Conner v. Associated Radiologists, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: M.D. Timothy M. Conner
Defendant: Associated Radiologists, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019cv00329
Filed: April 26, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Nature of Suit: Civil Shell Case Opening
Cause of Action: 77:7777
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 26 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 7 MOTION to Dismiss. Directing that the Court grants Defendant's motion to dismiss Counts One, Two, and Five and denies the motion as to the remaining counts. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 2/14/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (lca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Conner v. Associated Radiologists, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: M.D. Timothy M. Conner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Associated Radiologists, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?