Richardson v. Ames
Plaintiff: Raymond Andrew Richardson
Defendant: Donnie Ames
Case Number: 2:2020cv00573
Filed: August 31, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: John T Copenhaver
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Raymond Andrew Richardson in support of #16 RESPONSE and MOTION by Raymond Andrew Richardson for Summary Judgment (ts)
October 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 16 RESPONSE by Raymond Andrew Richardson in opposition to #10 MOTION by Donnie Ames to Dismiss #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) and MOTION for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-2, #2 Envelope) (ts)
October 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 LETTER to Raymond Richardson, from Rory L. Perry II dated 10/26/2020, re: #14 letter requesting copy of document. (klc)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 LETTER to Clerk of Court, from Raymond Richardson dated 10/19/2020, re: requesting Respondent be provided a copy by the Clerk's office. (kew)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MOTION by Raymond Andrew Richardson for Leave to File Supplemental Grounds to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. (kew)
October 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER AND NOTICE directing Petitioner to file response by 11/17/2020 to #10 MOTION by Donnie Ames to Dismiss Without Prejudice re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254). Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/16/2020. (cc: Petitioner; counsel of record) (mk)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Donnie Ames in support of #10 MOTION by Donnie Ames to Dismiss #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) (Proper, Andrea)
October 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION by Donnie Ames to Dismiss #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254). (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15) Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn.(Proper, Andrea)
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 EXHIBIT (DVD) by Raymond Andrew Richardson in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254). (DVD maintained in the Office of the Clerk of Court) (kew)
October 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrea N. Proper on behalf of Donnie Ames. (Proper, Andrea)
September 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 EXHIBIT (DVD) by Raymond Andrew Richardson in support of #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) (DVD maintained in the Office of the Clerk of Court). (ts)
September 4, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing that Respondent shall file an answer to the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) by 10/20/2020. Any replies or objections are due 11/17/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/4/2020. (Attachment: #1 certified mail receipt) (cc: petitioner; Attorney General of the State of West Virginia by certified mail) (lca)
September 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number CHAR017987. (lca)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee with copy of Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Funds. (ts)
September 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 CLERK'S NOTICE OF FILING OF PETITION UNDER 28 USC 2254 FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS to Respondent (with copy of complaint), Attorney General, and Petitioner. (ts)
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order CASE assigned to Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc)
August 31, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Raymond Andrew Richardson against Donnie Ames pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2254. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, Part 1, #2 Exhibit, Part 2, #3 Exhibit, Part 3, #4 Exhibit, Part 4, #5 Exhibit, Part 5, #6 Exhibit, Part 6, #7 Exhibit, Part 7, #8 Exhibit, Part 8, #9 Exhibit, Part 9, #10 Exhibit, Part 10, #11 Exhibit, Part 11, #12 Exhibit, Part 12, #13 Exhibit, Part 13, #14 Envelope) (ts) (Modified on 9/1/2020 to add missing page to attachment #1) (ts)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Ames
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raymond Andrew Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donnie Ames
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?