Louden et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
Plaintiff: John Louden, Maria Louden and R. L.
Defendant: Kroger Limited Partnership I
Case Number: 2:2022cv00317
Filed: August 4, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Joseph R Goodwin
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER directing that the scheduling conference previously scheduled for 10/3/2022 is cancelled and that this case shall proceed as follows: Amendment of pleadings and joinder of parties - 11/2/2022. Deadline for written discovery requests - 3/10/2023. Expert disclosure by party with burden of proof - 2/23/2023. Expert disclosure by opposing party - 3/27/2023. Expert disclosure for rebuttal purposes - 4/10/2023. Deposition deadline and close of discovery - 4/24/2023. Filing of dispositive motions - 5/15/2023. Responses to dispositive motions - 5/29/2023. Reply to response to dispositive motion - 6/5/2023. Settlement meeting - 5/24/2023. Filing of motions in limine - 7/24/2023. Responses to motions in limine - 7/31/2023. Plaintiff draft of pretrial order to defendant - 7/19/2023. Integrated pretrial order filed by defendant - 7/26/2023. Pretrial conference on 8/14/2023 at 10:00 AM. Proposed jury instructions filed - 9/5/2023. Final settlement conference on 9/11/2023 at 9:00 AM. Trial on 9/12/2023 at 8:30 AM. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/20/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (mfo)
September 16, 2022 Filing 9 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Kroger Limited Partnership I, John Louden, Maria Louden, R. L. (Mattingly, Alexis) (Modified on 9/19/2022 to add party filers) (kew).
September 1, 2022 Filing 8 REPLY by Kroger Limited Partnership I to #7 Response In Opposition. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit 1)(Mattingly, Alexis)
August 25, 2022 Filing 7 RESPONSE by R. L., John Louden, Maria Louden in opposition to #5 MOTION by Kroger Limited Partnership I to Dismiss Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Headley, Brian)
August 11, 2022 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Kroger Limited Partnership I in support of #5 MOTION by Kroger Limited Partnership I to Dismiss Complaint. (Mattingly, Alexis)
August 11, 2022 Filing 5 MOTION by Kroger Limited Partnership I to Dismiss Complaint Attached to #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachment: #1 Exhibit A)(Mattingly, Alexis) (Modified on 8/12/2022 to add link to #1 notice of removal) (kew).
August 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) - 8/29/2022. Last day for Rule 26(f) meeting - 9/12/2022. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) meeting - 9/19/2022. Scheduling Conference at 9:00 AM on 10/3/2022 at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse, 300 Virginia Street East, Room 6610 (Library/Conference Room), Charleston, WV. Entry of scheduling order - 10/11/2022. Last day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures - 10/17/2022. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 8/8/2022. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (mfo)
August 5, 2022 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
August 4, 2022 CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc)
August 4, 2022 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Kroger Limited Partnership I (Mattingly, Alexis)
August 4, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Kroger Limited Partnership I with summons, complaint and docket sheet from Circuit Court of Wood County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8242716. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (mk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Louden et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Louden
Represented By: Brian J. Headley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Louden
Represented By: Brian J. Headley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: R. L.
Represented By: Brian J. Headley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Limited Partnership I
Represented By: Alexis B. Mattingly
Represented By: Brittany Given Simmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?