Adkins et al v. Ratliff
Amber Adkins and James Adkins |
Zachery Ratliff |
2:2023cv00745 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
John T Copenhaver |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Zachery Ratliff for Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures. (Morrison, Brian) |
Filing 8 ORDER directing that the scheduling conference on 1/12/2024 at 9:30 AM is CANCELED and that this case shall proceed as follows: Amending the pleadings or joining parties - 3/11/2024. Last date to serve discovery requests - 5/24/2024. Opening Rule 26 expert disclosures - 5/9/2024. Responsive Rule 26 expert disclosures - 6/10/2024. Rebuttal Rule 26 expert disclosure - 6/24/2024. Discovery to close - 7/8/2024. Dispositive motions deadline - 7/29/2024. Response to dispositive motion - 8/12/2024. Reply to response to dispositive motion - 8/19/2024. Settlement Meeting - 9/30/2024. Motion in limine deadline - 10/7/2024. Responses for motions in limine - 10/15/2024. Proposed pretrial order to defendant - 10/2/2024. Integrated pretrial order - 10/9/2024. Pretrial Conference on 10/18/2024 at 11:00 AM. Proposed jury charge - 11/12/2024. Final settlement conference on 11/18/2024 at 10:00 AM. Trial on 11/19/2024 at 9:30 AM. All proceedings shall be held by the court at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse, Charleston, West Virginia. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 1/8/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (skm) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE by Zachery Ratliff in opposition to #5 MOTION by Amber Adkins, James Adkins to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Mingo County (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Morrison, Brian) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Amber Adkins, James Adkins in support of #5 MOTION by Amber Adkins, James Adkins to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Mingo County. (Smith, Greg) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Amber Adkins, James Adkins to Remand Case to Circuit Court of Mingo County. (Smith, Greg) |
Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under F.R. Civ. P. 12(b) - 12/18/2023. Last day for Rule 26(f) Meeting - 12/28/2023. Last day to file Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - 1/4/2024. Scheduling Conference at 09:30 AM on 1/12/2024 at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse in Charleston, before the undersigned, unless canceled. Entry of Scheduling Order - 1/18/2024. Last day to serve F.R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) disclosures - 1/29/2024. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 11/28/2023. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (lca) |
Filing 3 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ATTACHED TO #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand by Zachery Ratliff. (Morrison, Brian) (Modified on 11/22/2023 to add link to #1 notice of removal and to add jury demand) (kew). |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
CASE assigned to Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Zachery Ratliff with summons, complaint, and docket sheet from the Circuit Court of Mingo County. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt #AWVSDC-8539737. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Return of Service, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Notice of Filing, #4 State Court Docket Sheet, #5 State Court Documents, #6 Civil Cover Sheet) (mfo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.