Prunty v. Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc.
| Brittan Prunty |
| The Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2024cv00362 |
| July 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER AND NOTICE: Motions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) - 10/4/2024. Last day for Rule 26(f) meeting - 10/17/2024. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) meeting - 10/24/2024. Scheduling Conference at 9:30 AM on 11/7/2024 at the Robert C. Byrd United States Courthouse, 300 Virginia Street East, Room 6610 (Library/Conference Room), Charleston, WV. Entry of scheduling order - 11/14/2024. Last day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures - 11/21/2024. Signed by Judge Joseph R. Goodwin on 9/13/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (mfo)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER TO #1 Complaint by Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc..(Tuggle, Mitchell) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL by David A. Bosak on behalf of Brittan Prunty. (Bosak, David) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY from Manuel Herceg on behalf of Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. Local counsel: Mitchell B. Tuggle. Fee $50.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8714884. (Tuggle, Mitchell) |
| Filing 10 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Defendant Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. (Tuggle, Mitchell) |
| Filing 9 JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO THE #1 COMPLAINT to 9/13/2024 by Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc., Brittan Prunty. (Tuggle, Mitchell) (Modified on 8/8/2024 to add party filer) (kew). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT FORM by Emily Ford on behalf of Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. (Ford, Emily) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE AND COUNSEL CONTACT FORM by Mitchell B. Tuggle on behalf of Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. (Tuggle, Mitchell) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED by Personal Service for Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. served on 7/24/2024, answer due 8/14/2024. Summons served on Natasha Mushung/CT Corporation on behalf of The Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc. (Stewart, J.) (Modified on 7/29/2024 to correct the appearance of image and replace) (kew). |
| Filing 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, by Plaintiff Brittan Prunty (Hamrick, Jayson) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Tinsley. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. (klc) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO FILE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. as to Brittan Prunty (msa) (Modified on 7/19/2024 to add party filer) (ts). |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Western Sizzlin Stores, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (msa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $405.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8695025. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (msa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
