United Bank v. Allegheny Wood Products, Inc., et al
| United Bank |
| Allegheny Wood Products, Inc., Allegheny Wood Products International, Inc. and Allegheny Wood Timber Product, LLC |
| Christopher DeWeese |
| 2:2024mc00068 |
| March 14, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Joseph R Goodwin |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing of Amended Complaint and Amended Order of Receivership by Christopher DeWeese (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Amended Receivership Order)(Supple, Joe) |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S ORDER. For reasons appearing to the court, this action is reassigned from Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. to Judge Joseph R. Goodwin. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 3/20/2024. (cc: Judge Copenhaver; Judge Goodwin; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Senior Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. (klc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE by Christopher DeWeese of Filing Complaint and Order Appointing Receiver. Filing Fee $52.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-8612774. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit A-3, #5 Exhibit A-4, #6 Exhibit A-5, #7 Exhibit A-6, #8 Exhibit A-7, #9 Exhibit A-8, #10 Exhibit A-9, #11 Exhibit A-10, #12 Exhibit A-11, #13 Exhibit A-12, #14 Exhibit A-13, #15 Exhibit A-14, #16 Exhibit B, #17 Civil Cover Sheet) (kew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
