Harris v. Astrue

Harris v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Johnny D. Harris
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	3:2008cv01127
Filed:	September 29, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Wayne
Presiding Judge:	Robert C. Chambers
Presiding Judge:	Maurice G. Taylor, Jr.
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 23, 2010	Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court accepts and incorporates herein re 13 Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and Denies the plaintiff's 9 motion for judgment on the pleadings; grants the like 12 motion of the defendant and Affirms the decision of the Commissioner consistent with the findings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/23/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) (Modified on 3/25/2010 add link to #9 and #12 Briefs in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings and to clarify text) (mkw).
March 2, 2010	Filing 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Recommending that plaintiff's 9 motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied, that the like 12 motion of defendant be granted, and the decision of the Commissioner affirmed; This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Maurice G. Taylor, Jr.; Objections to Findings and Recommendation due by 03/19/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maurice G. Taylor, Jr. on 3/2/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm) (Modified on 3/4/2010 to clarify text) (mkw).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 23, 2010

Filing 14 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The Court accepts and incorporates herein re 13 Findings and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge and Denies the plaintiff's 9 motion for judgment on the pleadings; grants the like 12 motion of the defendant and Affirms the decision of the Commissioner consistent with the findings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 3/23/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (skm) (Modified on 3/25/2010 add link to #9 and #12 Briefs in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings and to clarify text) (mkw).

March 2, 2010

Filing 13 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Recommending that plaintiff's 9 motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied, that the like 12 motion of defendant be granted, and the decision of the Commissioner affirmed; This case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Maurice G. Taylor, Jr.; Objections to Findings and Recommendation due by 03/19/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Maurice G. Taylor, Jr. on 3/2/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (dcm) (Modified on 3/4/2010 to clarify text) (mkw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johnny D. Harris
Represented By:	Rose A. Cyrus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By:	Michael McGaughran
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?