Stiltner v. Cabell County Commission et al
| Cindy M. Stiltner |
| Cabell County Sheriff's Department and Cabell County Commission |
| 3:2013cv07513 |
| April 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part Plaintiff's 45 PETITION for Attorney's Fees; directing Defendants, or their attorneys, to pay Plaintiff's attorney the sum of $1,625.00 within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 4/1/2014. (cc: attys) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting Plaintiff's 21 MOTION for Sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(b)(2); Plaintiff shall have 20 days in which to provide the Court with an affidavit itemizing the fees and expenses incurred in preparing t he motion to compel and motion for sanctions, as well as any argument addressing the reasonableness of the requested award considering the factors contained in Robinson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC 560 F.3d 235, 243-44 (4th Cir. 2009); Defendants shall have 14 days thereafter to file a response in opposition to the Plaintiff's affidavit and argument. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 3/4/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (mkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
