S.M.B. v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
| S. M. B. |
| West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, Michael York, P. Owens and John Doe #1 |
| 3:2017cv01300 |
| February 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Huntington Office |
| Cabell |
| Robert C. Chambers |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 13 MOTION by West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority to Dismiss 1 Complaint; Plaintiff's claim for equitable relief against West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority is DISMISSED for mootness, and West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority is DISMISSED as a defendant in this case; Plaintiff's remaining claims against individual defendants named in Plaintiffs 1 Complaint remain ongoing pursuant to the Courts 21 Memorandum Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 10/26/2017. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw)
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants Michael York's and P. Owen's 9 MOTION to Dismiss; directing that Plaintiff's claims for money damages based on violations of the West Virginia Constitution are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 9/1/2017. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
