Howard v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Michael Floyd Howard, III
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number: 3:2019cv00006
Filed: January 4, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: Robert C Chambers
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2019 Filing 8 RESPONSE by Michael Floyd Howard, III to the Court's #6 Order. (Meisel, James)
January 4, 2019 Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Nancy A. Berryhill, re: #2 Complaint. Summons returnable 60 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (hkl)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER directing counsel to file with the Court a pleading certifying whether Dr. Kropac is or is not involved in this matter no later than 1/18/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/4/2019. (cc: counsel of record) (hkl)
January 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER AND NOTICE GRANTING IN FORMA PAUPERIS granting Plaintiff's #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; directing the Clerk of the Court to issue the summons(es) and Plaintiff to serve the summons(es) and complaint pursuant to Rule 4, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; further directing that the recovery, if any, obtained in this action shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court, who shall pay therefrom all unpaid costs taxed against plaintiff and pay the balance to the plaintiff and plaintiff's attorney, if any. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 1/4/2019. (cc: counsel of record) (hkl)
January 4, 2019 Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
January 2, 2019 CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc)
January 2, 2019 Filing 3 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Michael Floyd Howard, III for Nancy A. Berryhill, re: #2 Complaint. (hkl)
January 2, 2019 Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (hkl)
January 2, 2019 Filing 1 APPLICATION by Michael Floyd Howard, III to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs. (hkl) (Additional attachment added on 1/3/2019: #1 Proposed Order) (mkw). (Modified on 1/3/2019 to add proposed order as attachment #1 as it was inadvertently omitted) (mkw).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Represented By: Nora R. Koch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Floyd Howard, III
Represented By: James T. Meisel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?