Holland et al v. Trans-Med, LLC
| United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan, United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund, United Mine Workers Of America 1993 Benefit Plan, Joseph R. Reschini, Gail R. Wilensky, Carl E. VanHorn, Michael H. Holland, Michael McKown, Carlo Tarley, Marty Hudson and William P. Hobgood |
| Trans-Med, LLC |
| 3:2019cv00180 |
| March 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED by the Clerk on behalf of United Mine Workers Of America 1993 Benefit Plan, Gail R. Wilensky, Carl E. VanHorn, Joseph R. Reschini, Michael H. Holland, Joseph R. Reschini, Carlo Tarley, United Mine Workers of America Combined Benefit Fund, Michael McKown, United Mine Workers of America 1992 Benefit Plan, Marty Hudson, Joseph R. Reschini, William P. Hobgood, Michael McKown for Trans-Med, LLC, re: #1 Complaint, returnable 21 days. Original Summons and 2 copies returned to attorney for service. (jsa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # CHAR015627. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Receipt, #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
