Shull v. Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. et al
| Trina Kay Shull |
| Janet Shull, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., United Industries Corporation doing business as Hot Shot and United Industries Corporation and doing business as Hot Shot |
| 3:2020cv00585 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Robert C Chambers |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 TRANSMITTED CERTIFIED COPY of #11 Order to counsel of record. (jsa) |
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING this action without prejudice because Plaintiff has neither obtained service upon the defendants within 90 days after filing of the complaint, nor after the Court granted an extension to effectuate service of process to 2/8/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 2/12/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa)
|
| Filing 10 TRANSMITTED CERTIFIED COPY of #9 Order on Plaintiff's #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Effectuate Service of Process to counsel of record. (hkl) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF PROCESS granting Plaintiff's #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Effectuate Service of Process; directing that Plaintiff shall have 60 days from the date of entry of this Order to serve process upon defendants. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/10/2020. (cc: counsel of record) (hkl)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION by Trina Kay Shull for Extension of Time to Effectuate Service of Process in response to the Court's #7 Order. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Effectuate Service, #2 Certificate of Service)(Eves, Timothy) (Modified on 12/9/2020 to convert event to a motion) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing the plaintiff to demonstrate good cause for not serving the defendants with process; Failure to respond to this notice within ten days or an insufficient showing of good cause will result in dismissal of this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 12/9/2020. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (hkl)
|
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Janet Shull, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., United Industries Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (Attachments: #1 summons as to United Industries Corporation, #2 summons as to Janet Shull) (jsa) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Trina Kay Shull for Janet Shull, re: #1 Complaint. (Eves, Timothy) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Trina Kay Shull for United Industries Corporation, re: #1 Complaint. (Eves, Timothy) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS SUBMITTED by Trina Kay Shull for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. (Eves, Timothy) |
| Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $400.00. Receipt # CWVSDC-7731275. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
