Noland v. Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc.
Mary Noland |
Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. |
3:2020cv00782 |
December 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Robert C Chambers |
Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties, amended pleadings due by 4/30/2021. Discovery requests to be completed by 9/10/2021 and all depositions by 10/25/2021. Expert Witness List by parties bearing the burden of proof due by 7/6/2021, by party not bearing burden of proof due by 8/6/2021, and to solely contradict or rebut evidence due by 8/31/2021. Dispositive Motions except those filed under Rule 12(b) due by 11/15/2021, any response shall be filed within 14 days of the filing of the motion, with replies due within 7 days of the filing of the response. Settlement Meeting and Rule 26(a)(3) disclosures by 1/3/2022. Plaintiff's portion of proposed Pretrial Order to defendant due by 1/10/2022, Proposed Integrated Pretrial Order due by 1/18/2022. Pretrial Conference set for 1/24/2022 at 10:00 AM in Huntington before Judge Robert C. Chambers. Proposed Jury Charges due by 2/1/2022. Final Settlement Conference at 9:30 AM on 2/7/2022 in Huntington. Trial set for 2/8/2022 at 8:30 AM in Huntington before Judge Robert C. Chambers; further canceling the scheduling conference set for 3/8/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/21/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (hkl) |
Filing 10 RULE 26(f) REPORT OF PLANNING MEETING by Mary Noland, Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. (Simonton, Mark) (Modified on 1/20/2021 to add party filer) (mkw). |
Filing 9 ORDER AND NOTICE: Rule 12(b) Motions 2/2/2021. Rule 26(f) Meeting 2/16/2021. Last day to file report of Rule 26(f) Meeting 2/22/2021. Scheduling/status Conference at 11:30 AM on 3/8/2021 in Huntington. Entry of Scheduling Order 3/15/2021. Last Day to make Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures 3/22/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Chambers on 1/14/2021. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (mkw) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. for Defendant PrimeCare Medical of West Virginia, Inc.'s, First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents to Plaintiff. (Simonton, Mark) |
Filing 7 ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES to #1 Complaint by Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc.; Jury demand. (Simonton, Mark) |
Filing 6 CLERK'S ORDER pursuant to #5 Order, the referral of this civil action for discovery matters is transferred from Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 1/6/2021. (cc: Magistrate Judge Eifert; Magistrate Judge Tinsley; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
Filing 5 ORDER directing this case transferred to Rory L. Perry II, Clerk of Court, for reassignment of all discovery disputes in the instant matter to another Magistrate Judge within this district. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 1/6/2021. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented parties) (jsa) |
Filing 4 STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT, PRIMECARE MEDICAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, INC. TO RESPOND TO #1 COMPLAINT to January 13, 2021 by Mary Noland, Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc.; the parties stipulate and agree to an extension of time within which the Defendant is required to file an Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Simonton, Mark) (Modified on 1/5/2021 to add party filer) (mkw). |
RESET DEADLINE: Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. answer due 1/13/2021. (mkw) |
CASE assigned to Judge Robert C. Chambers. (klc) |
Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Eifert. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Summons returnable 21 days. Instructions to Counsel: This is your electronic summons. Please print as many copies of the Summons and Complaint as are necessary to effectuate service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. See Proof of Service page of this Summons form for filing a return of service if required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(l). (jsa) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT. Filing Fee $402.00. Receipt # AWVSDC-7817436. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (jsa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Noland v. Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Primecare Medical of West Virginia, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Mark Simonton |
Represented By: | D. C. Offutt, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Mary Noland | |
Represented By: | Hoyt E. Glazer |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.