Meadows v. Astrue
||Jack E. Meadows
||Michael J. Astrue
||September 29, 2008
||US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
||Thomas E. Johnston
||R. Clarke VanDervort
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||U.S. Government Defendant
|Jury Demanded By:
||42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 26, 2011
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: adopting the 28 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Magistrate Judge; granting Defendant's 21 Brief in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; denying Plaintiff's 23 Brief in Support of Judgment on the Pleadings; affirming the final decision of the Commissioner; dismissing this matter from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 9/26/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|March 31, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: declining to adopt the Magistrate Judge's 15 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying without prejudice 8 MOTION by Jack E. Meadows to Remand Case to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on the basis of new and material evidence and to Stay the Briefing Schedule herein; directing that parties file any Motion in Support of the Complaint or the Commissioner's decision by 4/30/2010; directing parties to submit any opposition or response thereto by 5/31/2010; directing parties to submit reply briefs in support of their motion by 6/10/2010. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/31/2010. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) Modified on 3/31/2010 to correct typo (cds).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?