In re: Gregory Collins Perry et al
| Gregory Collins Perry and Amy Lee Perry |
| Steve E. Sears and Diane B. Sears |
| Gregory Collins Perry and Amy Lee Perry |
| 5:2012cv00781 |
| March 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Appeal |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: that the MOTION of Gregory Perry and Amy Lee Perry for Re-Hearing Pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 8015 be DENIED. The Court remands this case back to the Bankruptcy Court for disposition as contemplated herein. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 4/23/2013. (cc: attys; USBC, any unrepresented party) (cds)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court does ORDER that the Cross-Appellant's appeal as stated in In Re: Gregory Collins Perry et al, Civil Action No. 5:12-cv-0917 (S.D.W.Va. March 29, 2012) be GRANTED, inasmuch as the Bankruptcy Court ERRED in finding that Mr. Perry demonstrated excusable neglect. The Court remands this case back to the Bankruptcy Court for disposition as contemplated herein. The Court ORDERS that Mr. Perry's appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's adverse ruling as s tated in In Re: Gregory Collins Perry et al. Civil Action No. 5:12-cv-0781 (S.D.W. Va. March 20, 2012) be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's docket. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 3/5/2013. (cc: U. S. Bankruptcy Court; attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
