McDowell v. Town of Sophia et al
Damon McDowell |
Town of Sophia, Town Council of Sophia, Sophia Police Department, Tomi Sue Peck, Timothy Capehart, John Doe Officer #1, John Doe Officer #2, Frank Priddy and Jane Doe Officer |
5:2012cv01340 |
April 30, 2012 |
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
Beckley Office |
Raleigh |
Irene C. Berger |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 196 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court does ORDER that Defendants Town of Sophia, Town Council of Sophia, Sophia Police Department, and Tomi Sue Peck's 95 MOTION to Dismiss be GRANTED. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 2/11/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court ORDERS that the 10 MOTION by Timothy Capehart, John Doe Officer #1, John Doe Officer #2, Frank Priddy, and Jane Doe Officer to Dismiss be GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff& #039;s Complaint be DISMISSED as to Defendants Priddy, John Doe Officer #2, and Jane Doe Officer; the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Capehart, Priddy, John Doe Officer #1, John Doe Officer #2, and Jane Doe Officer in this official capacity be DISMISSED; Plaintiff is entitled to proceed on his remaining claims against Defendant Capehart and John Doe Officer #1. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 8/30/2012. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.