Parrish v. Auto Detailing by Me, LLC
| Hunter Parrish, Kyle King, Florence McCallister and Ricky McCallister |
| Auto Detailing by Me, LLC, Matthew D. Epling, Gary D. Epling and John Dunn |
| 5:2012cv03759 |
| July 26, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Wherefore, after careful consideration and based on the findings contained herein, the Court does hereby ORDER that Defendant Det. Gary Epling's 122 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED as to Count IV - Outrag eous Conduct, and DENIED as to all other counts and that Defendant Sgt. John Dunn's 123 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED as to Count II - Assault and Battery, Count III - False Imprisonment, and Count IV - Outrageous Conduct, and DENIED as to all remaining counts. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 03/20/2014. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
|
Filing
107
ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' 68 MOTION to Compel Detective Gary Epling and Sergeant John Dunn to Fully Respond to Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents is GRANTED; Defendants shall file UNDER SEAL by 11/13/2013, the personal and departmental cell phone records for Det. Gary Epling and Sgt. John Dunn from 7/27/2011 through 8/1/2011; the Defendant shall file UNDER SEAL the personal departmental cell phone numbers for Det. Gary Epling and Sgt. John Dunn; it is ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file UNDER SEAL by 11/13/2013, a list of names and phone numbers they seek to discover; parties shall file a proposed Agreed Protective Order by 11/15/2013; the Court will conduct a telephonic hearing with the parties t o discuss the Court's in camera review of the sealed information on 11/19/2013 at 10:30 a.m. The Court ORDERS Defendants, should they wish to be heard regarding sanctions, to file with the Court within 10 business days of the entry of this Order , a Memorandum explaining why their nondisclosure was substantially justified or why an award of attorney's fees would be unjust; the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to file an itemized statement of the costs and fees associated with this Motion within 10 business days of the entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort on 11/7/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (slr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
