Elkins v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
| Stevie Elkins |
| Diversified Collection Services, Inc. and Bank of America, N.A. |
| 5:2013cv00927 |
| January 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Beckley Office |
| Raleigh |
| Irene C. Berger |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: The Court does hereby ORDER that Bank of America, N.A.'s 19 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and Defendant Diversified Collection Services, Inc.'s 21 Partial Joinder in Defendant Bank o f America, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintff's Amended Complaint be GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, the Court ORDERS that BANA's motion be GRANTED as to Count One (WVCCPA Violations). Inasmuch as Defendant Diversifi ed did not seek relief from Count One, the claim survives against Defendant Diversified. Moreover, the Court ORDERS that both Defendants' motion to dismiss Count Two (Negligence) be GRANTED. Further, the Court ORDERS that BANA's motion to dismiss Count Four (Invasion of Privacy) of the First Amended Complaint be GRANTED. Consequently, Count Two is DISMISSED and Count Four as to BANA only is DISMISSED. Finally, the Court ORDERS that the instant motions be DENIED as to the remaining alleged claims. Signed by Judge Irene C. Berger on 7/15/2013. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (msa)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
