Ratliff et al v. Lester et al
Plaintiff: Michel Bennett, II and Marshall Louis Ratliff
Defendant: Sagt. Chad Lester and CO Cornett
Case Number: 5:2020cv00610
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2020 Filing 7 INCORRECT ENTRY: IMAGE DELETED (msa).
September 21, 2020 Filing 6 INCORRECT ENTRY: IMAGE DELETED. (msa)
September 21, 2020 Filing 5 INCORRECT ENTRY: IMAGE DELETED. (msa).
September 21, 2020 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION: ERROR: 7 Docketed in wrong case; CORRECTION: Image deleted. (msa).
September 21, 2020 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION: ERROR: 5 and 6 Docketed in wrong case; CORRECTION: Images deleted. (msa)
September 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE: Notifying Plaintiff Ratliff that if he wishes to proceed with his Section 1983 claim, he should amend his Complaint by 10/15/2020, as more specifically detailed herein; advising Plaintiff Bennett that, if he wishes to file a claim, he should do so by 10/15/2020, as more fully explained herein; directing the Clerk to mail a copy of this Order and a form Complaint to Plaintiff Ratliff, and a copy of this Order, a form Complaint, and a blank Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis to Plaintiff Bennett. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 9/17/2020. (cc: Plaintiff Ratliff, with form Complaint; Plaintiff Bennett, with form Complaint and blank Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis) (slr)
September 16, 2020 CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
September 16, 2020 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (btm)
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (btm)
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 APPLICATION by Marshall Louis Ratliff to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (btm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ratliff et al v. Lester et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sagt. Chad Lester
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CO Cornett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michel Bennett, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marshall Louis Ratliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?