Jones v. Young
| Christopher Antuan Jones |
| Warden David L. Young |
| 5:2021cv00552 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Cheryl A Eifert |
| Frank W Volk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
MOTION by Christopher Antuan Jones to Reply to Respondent's #8 Response of Order to Show Cause. (btm)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER directing that the Petitioner shall have sixty (60) days after service of the #8 Response to #7 Order to Show Cause in which to file a reply. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 10/21/2021. (cc: Petitioner and counsel of record) (msa)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by David L. Young (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Bailey, Jason)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing Respondent to answer or otherwise respond to the #2 Petition within 60 days of the entry of this Order showing cause, if any, why the relief sought by Petitioner should not be granted; Petitioner may, if he wishes, file a reply to the answer or response of the Respondent within 60 days after service of same by the Respondent. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 10/14/2021. (cc: Petitioner; United States Attorney for the Southern District of West Virginia with a copy of #2 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus) (btm)
|
|
Filing 6
Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number CHAR019629. (mfo)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing that Petitioner's #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Costs is denied; Petitioner shall pay the $5.00 filing fee by 11/15/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert on 10/12/2021. (cc: Petitioner) (btm)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Cheryl A. Eifert for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc)
|
|
CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
|
|
Filing 3
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION by Christopher Antuan Jones for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. (btm) (Modified on 10/12/2021 to add exhibit identifier) (ts). (Modified on 11/22/2021 to terminate motion)(ts).
|
|
Filing 2
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Christopher Antuan Jones against David L. Young pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (btm)
|
|
Filing 1
APPLICATION by Christopher Antuan Jones to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. (Attachment: #1 Inmate Inquiry) (btm) (Modified on 10/12/2021 to split and replace images) (ts).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones v. Young | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Christopher Antuan Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden David L. Young | |
| Represented By: | Jason S. Bailey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
