Magnus v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| Clinton Rudy Magnus |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons and FCI Beckley Warden |
| 5:2022cv00430 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia |
| Frank W Volk |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CONFIRMATION from U.S. District of Minnesota that the case has been opened in that district as 0:22-cv-02706, filed 10/27/2022. (ts) |
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE directing that this matter be transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, Minneapolis Division, for additional proceedings. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 10/26/2022. (cc: Petitioner) (msa)
|
| Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED JANUARY 4, 2016. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: attys; any unrepresented party) (klc) |
| CASE assigned to Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc) |
| Filing 2 Filing Fee: $5.00, Receipt Number 5000047. (msa) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Clinton Rudy Magnus against Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. Filing Fee $5. Receipt # 5000047. (msa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
