Moody v. O'Malley
Plaintiff: Curtis Edward Moody
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Case Number: 5:2024cv00539
Filed: October 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Presiding Judge: Omar J Aboulhosn
Referring Judge: Frank W Volk
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2024 Filing 7 TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held before the Administrative Law Judge. (Attachment: #1 Continuation)(Neil, Gregory)
October 9, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ATTORNEY INFORMATION by Robert J. Parker updating name and/or firm information on behalf of Curtis Edward Moody. (Parker, Robert)
October 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing that Defendant SHALL file a Transcript no later than 60 days after notice of the action is given under Rule 3, which is 12/2/2024; Plaintiff SHALL file and serve on the Commissioner a brief for the requested relief within 30 days after the Transcript is filed; the Commissioner SHALL file and serve on the Plaintiff a brief within 30 days after service of the Plaintiff's brief; and Plaintiff may file a reply brief and serve it on the Commissioner within 14 days after service of the Commissioner's brief; serving a motion under Rule 4(c) alters these deadlines as set forth in Supplemental SSA Rules 4(d) and 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/3/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
October 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE granting Plaintiff's #1 APPLICATION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees or Costs; directing that that the recovery, if any, obtained in this action shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court, who shall pay therefrom all unpaid costs and fees taxed against the Plaintiff and pay the balance to the Plaintiff and his attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn on 10/3/2024. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (jsa)
October 3, 2024 Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE: ASSIGNMENT AND REFERRAL OF CIVIL ACTIONS AND MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGES ENTERED SEPTEMBER 1, 2024. This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn for Findings of Fact and Recommendations for disposition. (cc: counsel of record and any pro se party) (klc)
October 2, 2024 CASE assigned to Chief Judge Frank W. Volk. (klc)
October 2, 2024 Filing 2 COMPLAINT. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (btm)
October 2, 2024 Filing 1 APPLICATION by Curtis Edward Moody to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees and Costs. (btm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moody v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin J. O'Malley
Represented By: William S. Thompson, United States Attorney
Represented By: Social Security Administration - Office of General
Represented By: Gregory P. Neil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtis Edward Moody
Represented By: Robert J. Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?