Bailey v. Holzapfel
Petitioner: Dwight Bailey
Respondent: W. Holzapfel
Case Number: 5:2024cv00660
Filed: November 18, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2024 Filing 2 NOTICE to Petitioner of Failure to Remit Filing Fee. (arb)
November 18, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS by Dwight Bailey against W. Holzapfel, Warden, FCI Beckley, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documentation, #2 Envelope) (arb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the West Virginia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bailey v. Holzapfel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Dwight Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: W. Holzapfel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?