Jordan v. Watters
Case Number: 1:2006cv00799
Filed: July 26, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Green Bay Office
Presiding Judge: William C Griesbach
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER GRANTING 23 MOTION for Reconsideration and the judgment is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order respondent answer the petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that unless respondent files a dispositive motion with its answer the parties shall abide by the following schedule regarding briefing (see attached order for further details), signed by Judge William C Griesbach on January 23, 2007. (cc: all counsel)(Griesbach, William)
August 3, 2006 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Judge William C Griesbach on August 3, 2006. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that within 30 days of the date of this order respondent answer the petition. FURTHER, IT IS ORDERED that unless respondent files a dispositive motion with its answer the parties shall abide by the following schedule (see Order). FURTHER, it is ordered that petitioner's 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Watters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?