Rivera v. Siller et al
1:2006cv00910 |
August 22, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Green Bay Office |
William C Griesbach |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS ORDERED that the Milwaukee County Sheriff or his designee shall collect from the plaintiff's prison trust account the $342.48 balance of the filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the claim against Defendant Resar is DISMISSED without prejudice. The claims against Defendants Siller, Payne and Burems may proceed at this time. The U.S. Marshal's Service shall serve a copy of the complaint, waiver of service f orm and/or the summons and this order upon the defendants. IT IS ORDERED that the remaining defendants shall file a responsive pleading to the plaintiff's complaint. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that copies of this order be sent to the warden or superintendent of the institution where the inmate is confined, the City Attorney for the City of Milwaukee and AAG Corey Finkelmeyer, signed by Judge William C Griesbach on September 11, 2006. (cc: all counsel) (Griesbach, William) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rivera v. Siller et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.