Tracy Ehmann v Oshkosh Corporation
| Tracy Ehmann |
| Oshkosh Corporation |
| 1:2019cv01128 |
| August 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Oshkosh Corporation regarding Reply Brief in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss (Haase, John) |
| Filing 15 REPLY BRIEF in Support filed by Oshkosh Corporation re #10 MOTION to Dismiss . (Haase, John) |
| Filing 14 BRIEF in Opposition filed by Tracy Ehmann re #10 MOTION to Dismiss . (mac) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel C W Narvey on behalf of Oshkosh Corporation. Attorney(s) appearing: Daniel C.W. Narvey (Narvey, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Oshkosh Corporation (Haase, John) |
| Filing 11 BRIEF in Support filed by Oshkosh Corporation re #10 MOTION to Dismiss . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. A - Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Unpublished Cases)(Haase, John) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Oshkosh Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Haase, John) |
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Oshkosh Corporation. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Haase, John) |
| Filing 8 DISCLOSURE Statement by Oshkosh Corporation. (Haase, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Annie Laurie Eiden on behalf of Oshkosh Corporation. Attorney(s) appearing: Annie L. Eiden (Eiden, Annie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by John A Haase on behalf of Oshkosh Corporation. Attorney(s) appearing: John A. Haase (Haase, John) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tracy Ehmann. Oshkosh Corporation served on 8/6/2019. (tlf) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Oshkosh Corporation filed by Tracy Ehmann. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(mac) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Tracy Ehmann. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (cav) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Tracy Ehmann. (cav) |
| Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT against Oshkosh Corporation filed by Tracy Ehmann. Jury demand (Filing Fee PAID ; 4689-5495) (Service Packet Issued) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(cav) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tracy Ehmann v Oshkosh Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tracy Ehmann | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Oshkosh Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Daniel C W Narvey |
| Represented By: | John A Haase |
| Represented By: | Annie Laurie Eiden |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
