Ahmadian v. CR Meyer and Sons Inc
| Mehdi Ahmadian |
| CR Meyer and Sons Company and CR Meyer and Sons Inc |
| 1:2019cv01519 |
| October 16, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| William C Griesbach |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Opening Modification(s); The following modification(s) have been made to your case entry: One or more party names have been modified and party addresses have been removed - please remember to follow the Party Name Guidelines found on our website. ; Please refer to the # attorney case opening instructions, the # summons instructions and the # party name guidelines found in the user manual for further guidance (tlf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Mehdi Ahmadian. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number AWIEDC-3249820) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dunlap, Andrew) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge William C Griesbach ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (ds) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
