Scanlan v. Saul
Plaintiff: Tracy Scanlan
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Case Number: 1:2020cv01117
Filed: July 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Presiding Judge: Nancy Joseph
Referring Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Skutch Cohn on behalf of Andrew Saul. Attorney(s) appearing: Emily S. Cohn (Cohn, Emily)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiffs brief due 12/21/2020; Defendants response due 2/1/2021; Plaintiffs reply due 2/16/2021. (cc: all counsel) (asc)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE by Tracy Scanlan of lack of affidavit of service (Duncan, Dana)
September 9, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tracy Scanlan. Andrew Saul served on 8/17/2020. (Duncan, Dana)
August 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE ON CONSENT signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 8/25/2020. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Pamela Pepper no longer assigned to case. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
August 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Andrew Saul. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order FILING FEE Received: $400.00, receipt number MK4689083497. (bx)
July 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Chief Judge Pamela Pepper on 7/24/2020 DENYING #3 plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed without prepaying filing fee. By 8/14/2020, plaintiff to pay filing fee; failure to pay by deadline may result in dismissal. (cc: all counsel)(cb)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Tracy Scanlan. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Duncan, Dana)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Tracy Scanlan. (Duncan, Dana)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Tracy Scanlan. (Duncan, Dana)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul by Tracy Scanlan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duncan, Dana)
July 22, 2020 Opinion or Order NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Chief Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scanlan v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Represented By: Emily Skutch Cohn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Scanlan
Represented By: Dana W Duncan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?