Jackson v. Thurmer et al
| Jevon D Jackson |
| Michael Thurmer, Rick Raemisch, Matthew J Frank, Gary Ankarlo, Deborah L Fischer, Corey F Finkelmeyer, David E Hoel, Kevin Potter and John Doe |
| 2:2007cv00919 |
| October 15, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Fond du Lac |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/9/09 as follows: granting in part and denying in part 41 defendants' motion for summary judgment; and dismissing defendants Gary Ankarlo and Michael Thurmer from this action. See Order. (cc: plaintiff, all counsel)(nm)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 2/4/09 as follows: granting 23 plaintiff's motion to serve additional interrogatories - plaintiff may submit the interrogatories on or before 2/27/09 and defendants shall respond on or before 3/30/09; denying 32 plaintiff's motion to compel discovery; denying as moot 54 defendants' motion to stay discovery; denying as moot 56 plaintiff's motion for continuance; no additional discovery will be permitted; plaintiff shall file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment on or before 5/1/09. See Order. (cc: plaintiff, all counsel) (nm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
