Ludke v. Kettle Morraine Correctional Institution et al
| Jason M Ludke |
| William McCreedy, Sgt Schmidt, Robert Humphreys, Kelly Salinas, James LaBelle, Kettle Morraine Correctional Institution, Lori Alsum and Charles Coles |
| 2:2011cv00506 |
| May 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Dodge |
| Charles N Clevert |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 32 , Denying as Moot Plaintiff's Motion for Order to Provide Law Library 31 and Dismissing Case. (cc: all counsel; via US Mail to Plaintiff) ((cef), C. N. Clevert, Jr.)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP 6 , Denying as Moot Motion for Order to Use Release Account to Pay Initial Partial Filing Fee and Lump Sum Payment on Costs of Suit 8 , Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Regarding the First, Fi fth, Eighth and Thirteenth Amendments 21 , Dismissing Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel 9 , Dismissing Plaintiff's Motion to Provide Law Library and Indigent Legal Supplies 10 , Dismissing Plaintiff's Second Motion to Provide Law Library 17 , and Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Lump Sum Payment 24 . (cc: all counsel; via US Mail to Plaintiff & Warden) ((cef), C. N. Clevert, Jr.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
