Hackensmith v. Port City Steamship Holding Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Wisconsin Eastern District Hackensmith v. Port City Steamship Holding Company

Hackensmith v. Port City Steamship Holding Company

Plaintiff:	Jean Hackensmith
Defendant:	Port City Steamship Holding Company
Case Number:	2:2012cv00786
Filed:	August 1, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit:	Marine
Cause of Action:	46 U.S.C. § 688
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 9, 2013	Filing 49 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 4/9/13 as follows: pursuant to 42 the Stipulation of the parties, the following are dismissed with prejudice: Plaintiff's Jones Act negligence claim against Port City Steamship Holding Company; Plai ntiff's unseaworthiness claim against Port City Steamship Services, Inc.; Plaintiff's general maritime law loss of consortium claim against Port City Steamship Services, Inc.; any loss of consortium claim Plaintiff may have had against De fendant Port City Steamship Services, Inc., and, any claim for future loss of wages Plaintiff may have had against both Defendants under both her Jones Act negligence and unseaworthiness claims; denying as moot 33 and 36 Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment; granting 30 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and dismissing Plaintiff's claim for punitive, loss of consortium, and other non-pecuniary damages under both her Jones Act and unseaworthiness claims; and denying 39 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend her complaint. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (nm)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 9, 2013

Filing 49 ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 4/9/13 as follows: pursuant to 42 the Stipulation of the parties, the following are dismissed with prejudice: Plaintiff's Jones Act negligence claim against Port City Steamship Holding Company; Plai ntiff's unseaworthiness claim against Port City Steamship Services, Inc.; Plaintiff's general maritime law loss of consortium claim against Port City Steamship Services, Inc.; any loss of consortium claim Plaintiff may have had against De fendant Port City Steamship Services, Inc., and, any claim for future loss of wages Plaintiff may have had against both Defendants under both her Jones Act negligence and unseaworthiness claims; denying as moot 33 and 36 Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment; granting 30 Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and dismissing Plaintiff's claim for punitive, loss of consortium, and other non-pecuniary damages under both her Jones Act and unseaworthiness claims; and denying 39 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend her complaint. See Order. (cc: all counsel) (nm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hackensmith v. Port City Steamship Holding Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Hackensmith
Represented By:	Donald B Beaton
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Port City Steamship Holding Company
Represented By:	Steven B Belgrade
Represented By:	John A O'Donnell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?