Sonnichsen v. Principal Life Insurance Company

Defendant: Principal Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Michael Sonnichsen
Case Number: 2:2012cv01232
Filed: December 4, 2012
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Racine
Presiding Judge: Rudolph T Randa
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 7, 2013 24 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 3/7/2013 DENYING 4 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Michael Sonnichsen; GRANTING 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Principal Life Insurance Co.; Clerk of Court to enter judgment accordingly. (cc: all counsel)(cb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sonnichsen v. Principal Life Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Principal Life Insurance Company
Represented By: Edna S Kersting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Sonnichsen
Represented By: Kevin J Demet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.