Saddy v. Agnesian Health Care et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 13, 2017
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 2/13/2017 DISMISSING Defendants Agnesian Health Care and Waupun Memorial Hospital from action and DENYING 166 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. (cc: all counsel) (jm)
|February 22, 2016
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 2/22/16: ADOPTING 141 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge; GRANTING 135 Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiff; this district's pro se staff attorneys shall secure c ounsel to represent Plaintiff within 21 days of the entry of this order; GRANTING 137 Plaintiff's unopposed Motion to Stay proceedings; VACATING the dates provided in 133 the Court's previous trial scheduling order; and, within 21 days of the appearance of Plaintiff's new counsel, the parties shall file a joint report proposing a new schedule. (cc: Plaintiff, all counsel)(nm)
|September 16, 2014
ORDER signed by Judge J P Stadtmueller on 9/16/14 ADOPTING 100 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Aaron E. Goodstein; and, DENYING 18 and 36 Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment. See Order. (cc: all counsel)(nm)
|August 11, 2014
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Aaron E Goodstein recommending that plaintiff's inmate complaint be considered timely filed, or, in the alternative, that plaintiff was prevented from timely filing his inmate complaint; written objections may be filed within 14 days; see order for details (cc: all counsel, plaintiff via first class mail)(vkb)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?