Blackmon v. Baenen et al
| Michael A Blackmon |
| Edward F Wall, Michael Baenen and Jane Doe |
| 2:2013cv00625 |
| June 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Brown |
| Rudolph T Randa |
| Prisoner: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER DISMISSING CASE signed by Judge Rudolph T. Randa on 8/28/2013. 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. 6 MOTION for Joinder DENIED as moot. 8 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint DENIED as moot. 12 MOTION to waive init ial partial filing fee GRANTED. 13 MOTION to Amend/Correct Court Record DENIED as moot. 15 MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint GRANTED, proposed Amended Complaint is operative complaint in this action. Action DISMISSED pursuant to 28 USC § 7; 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim. Clerk of Court to document that: inmate brought action dismissed for failure to state a claim under 28 USC §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1); inmate has incurred a "strike&q uot; under 28 USC §1915(g). Plaintiff to pay the $350 balance of filing fee to Clerk of Court. The Court certifies that appeal from this matter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 USC §1915(a)(3) unless Plaintiff offers bona fide arguments supporting appeal (cc: all counsel, via US mail to Michael Blackmon)(cb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
