Duvall-Truss v. Baenen

Respondent: Michael Baenen
Petitioner: Learon Duvall-Truss
Case Number: 2:2013cv00863
Filed: July 29, 2013
Court: Wisconsin Eastern District Court
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Brown
Presiding Judge: Charles N Clevert
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
January 31, 2014 22 Opinion or Order of the Court DECISION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 1/31/2014 GRANTING 12 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss; FURTHER ORDERED that Duvall-Truss' petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED as untimely. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.. (cc: all counsel, mailed to petitioner) (djd)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duvall-Truss v. Baenen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Baenen
Represented By: Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Learon Duvall-Truss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.