Patterson v. Triangle Tool Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Wisconsin Eastern District Patterson v. Triangle Tool Corporation

Patterson v. Triangle Tool Corporation

Plaintiff:	John E Patterson
Defendant:	Triangle Tool Corporation
Case Number:	2:2014cv01557
Filed:	December 16, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit:	Family and Medical Leave Act
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 2601
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 26, 2016	Filing 55 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/26/16 that the plaintiffs motion to file a supplemental complaint and for reconsideration of my summary-judgment decision is DENIED. Further ordering that the defendants motion in opposition to th e plaintiffs motion to file a supplemental complaint is DENIED as unnecessary. Further ordering that a telephonic status conference will be held on October 12, 2016 at 11:30 a.m. for the purpose of scheduling further proceedings on the plaintiffs remaining claims. Counsel should call 414/297-1285 to provide contact information. (cc: all counsel) (dm)
June 22, 2016	Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/22/16 that defendants motion for summary judgment 26 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted with respect to all claims other than plaintiffs claim that he was laid off in February 2013 because of his age, disability, and use of FMLA leave. (cc: all counsel) (dm)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 26, 2016

Filing 55 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 9/26/16 that the plaintiffs motion to file a supplemental complaint and for reconsideration of my summary-judgment decision is DENIED. Further ordering that the defendants motion in opposition to th e plaintiffs motion to file a supplemental complaint is DENIED as unnecessary. Further ordering that a telephonic status conference will be held on October 12, 2016 at 11:30 a.m. for the purpose of scheduling further proceedings on the plaintiffs remaining claims. Counsel should call 414/297-1285 to provide contact information. (cc: all counsel) (dm)

June 22, 2016

Filing 50 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 6/22/16 that defendants motion for summary judgment 26 is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is granted with respect to all claims other than plaintiffs claim that he was laid off in February 2013 because of his age, disability, and use of FMLA leave. (cc: all counsel) (dm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patterson v. Triangle Tool Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Triangle Tool Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: John E Patterson
Represented By:	Michael J Gentry
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?