Werner v. Richmond
Plaintiff: Patrick James Werner
Defendant: Heather Lynn Richmond
Case Number: 2:2015cv00116
Filed: January 29, 2015
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Winnebago
Presiding Judge: Pamela Pepper
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 DECISION AND ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 9/4/2015 GRANTING 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; GRANTING 4 Motion to Waive Initial Partial Filing Fee; DENYING AS MOOT 5 Motion to Have Defendants Served through Pacer; and SCREENING plaintiff's Complaint and DISMISSING case.(cc: all counsel; by US Mail to plaintiff) (pwm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Werner v. Richmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick James Werner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heather Lynn Richmond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?