Henderson v. Foster

Henderson v. Foster

Petitioner:	James Lamar Henderson
Respondent:	Brian Foster
Case Number:	2:2017cv00849
Filed:	June 19, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Racine
Presiding Judge:	William E Duffin
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 27, 2018	Filing 20 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 2/27/2018: DISMISSING Ground Four of Petitioner's Petition; DENYING 1 Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; DENYING Certificate of Appealability; and DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to James Lamar Henderson at Green Bay Correctional Institution)(jm)
October 23, 2017	Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 10/23/2017 GRANTING 10 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSING Grounds One, Two, and Three of Petitioner's Petition. Briefing to proceed on Ground Four as follows: Respondent to file answe r to the Petition within 30 days; Petitioner's brief in support of his Petition due within 60 days of filing of Respondent's answer; Respondent's opposition brief due within 60 days of service of Petitioner's brief or 120 days of this Order if Petitioner does not file a brief; Petitioner's reply due within 30 days of filing of Respondent's brief. Civil L.R. 7(f) governs page limitations. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel, via mail to James Lamar Henderson at Green Bay Correctional Institution) (jm)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 27, 2018

Filing 20 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 2/27/2018: DISMISSING Ground Four of Petitioner's Petition; DENYING 1 Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; DENYING Certificate of Appealability; and DISMISSING CASE with prejudice. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to James Lamar Henderson at Green Bay Correctional Institution)(jm)

October 23, 2017

Filing 15 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 10/23/2017 GRANTING 10 Respondent's Motion to Dismiss and DISMISSING Grounds One, Two, and Three of Petitioner's Petition. Briefing to proceed on Ground Four as follows: Respondent to file answe r to the Petition within 30 days; Petitioner's brief in support of his Petition due within 60 days of filing of Respondent's answer; Respondent's opposition brief due within 60 days of service of Petitioner's brief or 120 days of this Order if Petitioner does not file a brief; Petitioner's reply due within 30 days of filing of Respondent's brief. Civil L.R. 7(f) governs page limitations. See Order for further details. (cc: all counsel, via mail to James Lamar Henderson at Green Bay Correctional Institution) (jm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henderson v. Foster
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: James Lamar Henderson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Foster
Represented By:	Wisconsin Dept of Justice - Habeas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?