Daul v. Doe
| Jesse Aaron Daul |
| John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 2:2017cv00952 |
| July 12, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Brown |
| William E Duffin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 7/9/2019. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the defendants' motion forsummary judgment (ECF No. 94 ) be GRANTED based on Daul's failure to opposethe motion and based on his failure to diligently pursue his case. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED and that judgment be entered accordingly. Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin. (cc: all counsel, plaintiff)(mlm)
|
|
Filing
10
SCREENING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 11/22/2017. IT IS ORDERED that Daul's motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee (ECF No. 2 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Daul shall file an amende d complaint on or before December 29, 2017, which contains only related claims as described in this Order. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, if Daul does not file an amended complaint by December 29, 2017 that complies with the requirements of Rules 18 and 20, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (cc: all counsel, Warden, plaintiff with Complaint form) (mlm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
