Tyson v. United States of America
| Jason J Tyson |
| United States of America |
| 2:2017cv01274 |
| September 21, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| J P Stadtmueller |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 2/21/2018 DENYING 18 Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend the Court's 1/30/2018 Order and Judgment. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jason J. Tyson at Allenwood FCI) (jm)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 1/30/2018: DENYING 1 Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255; DISMISSING CASE with prejudice; and DENYING certificate of appealability. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jason J. Tyson at Allenwood FCI) (jm)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 12/15/2017. 9 Respondent's Request for Extension of Time GRANTED. Respondent to file an answer or other appropriate motion by 1/8/2018; Petitioner to file a response by 2/7/2018; if Respondent filed a motion in lieu of an answer, Respondent may file a reply brief by 2/21/2018. 8 Petitioner's Motion for Discovery GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jason J. Tyson at Allenwood Medium FCI) (jm)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 11/15/2017: GRANTING 5 Petitioner's Motion to Amend Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence and GRANTING 6 Respondent's Request for Extension of Time. Respondent to file an answer or other appropriate motion, including as to Petitioner's new ground, by 12/12/2017; Petitioner to file a response by 1/12/2017; if Respondent filed a motion in lieu of an answer, Respondent may file a reply brief by 1/26/2017. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jason J. Tyson at USP Lee) (jm)
|
|
Filing
2
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 10/2/2017. Petitioner PERMITTED to proceed on Ground One of Motion (ineffective assistance of appellate counsel); Ground Two (government breach of plea agreement) DISMISSED. By 11/1/2017, Responde nt to file an answer or other appropriate motion; Petitioner to file a response by 12/1/2017; if Respondent filed a motion in lieu of an answer, Respondent may file a reply brief by 12/18/2017. See Order. (cc: all counsel, via mail to Jason J. Tyson at USP Lee)(jm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tyson v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jason J Tyson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Gail J Hoffman(Designation Assistant US Attorney) |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
