Riley v. Kirsan Engineering Inc
Plaintiff: Brooke Riley
Defendant: Kirsan Engineering Inc
Case Number: 2:2017cv01361
Filed: October 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Kenosha
Presiding Judge: William E Duffin
Nature of Suit: Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin on 5/2/2018 approving the parties' Settlement Agreement. (cc: all counsel)(mlm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Riley v. Kirsan Engineering Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kirsan Engineering Inc
Represented By: Peter E Hansen
Represented By: Alan E Seneczko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke Riley
Represented By: Larry A Johnson
Represented By: Timothy P Maynard
Represented By: Summer H Murshid
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?