Daul v. Tomlin et al
| Jesse Aaron Daul |
| Keith Tomlin, Michael Bernstein, Tammy Devries, Jeffrey Wagner and John Doe |
| 2:2017cv01719 |
| December 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Fond du Lac |
| Lynn Adelman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 03/13/2018. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee 2 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to waive the initial partial filing fe e 8 is GRANTED. ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint 9 is GRANTED. The clerks office will docket plaintiffs proposed amended complaint (Docket No. 9-1) as the operative complaint in this case. ORDERED that plainti ffs motion to supplement the complaint 10 is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Tomlin, Schwochert, Pollard, Schneider, Pederson, Hayes, Campshure, Jeffrey Wagner, Zeisser, and Sellen are DISMISSED. FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to an informa l service agreement between the Wisconsin Department of Justice and this court, copies of plaintiffs complaint and this order are being electronically sent today to the Wisconsin Department of Justice for service on defendants Tammy Devries, Michael Bernstein, and Buffy Goslinowski. ORDERED that, pursuant to the informal service agreement between the Wisconsin Department of Justice and this court, defendants Tammy Devries, Michael Bernstein, and Buffy Goslinowski shall file a responsive pleading to the complaint within sixty days of receiving electronic notice of this order. ORDERED that the agency having custody of the plaintiff shall collect from his institution trust account the $350 filing fee. ORDERED that a copy of this order be sent to the officer in charge of the agency where plaintiff is confined. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may not begin discovery until after the court enters a scheduling order setting deadlines for discovery and dispositive motions. (cc: all counsel, Plaintiff, Warden) (lls)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
