Deyot v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Wisconsin Eastern District Deyot v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution

Deyot v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution

Plaintiff:	Stephanie Ann Deyot
Defendant:	Taycheedah Correctional Institution
Case Number:	2:2018cv00254
Filed:	February 20, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office:	Milwaukee Office
County:	Fond du Lac
Presiding Judge:	Lynn Adelman
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 20, 2018	Filing 9 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 03/17/2018. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee 2 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel 7 is DENIED without prejudice . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint consistent with this order by April 16, 2018. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by the deadline, the court will infer that she no longer wishes to pursue this case and will dismiss it without prejudice based on her failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of the plaintiff shall collect from her institution trust account the $337.90 balance of the filing fee by collecting monthly payments from plaintiff's prison trust account. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that a copy of this order be sent to the officer in charge of the agency where plaintiff is confined. (cc: all counsel, Plaintiff, Warden) (lls)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 20, 2018

Filing 9 SCREENING ORDER signed by Judge Lynn Adelman on 03/17/2018. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee 2 is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel 7 is DENIED without prejudice . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint consistent with this order by April 16, 2018. If plaintiff does not file an amended complaint by the deadline, the court will infer that she no longer wishes to pursue this case and will dismiss it without prejudice based on her failure to prosecute. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the agency having custody of the plaintiff shall collect from her institution trust account the $337.90 balance of the filing fee by collecting monthly payments from plaintiff's prison trust account. IT IS ALSO ORDERED that a copy of this order be sent to the officer in charge of the agency where plaintiff is confined. (cc: all counsel, Plaintiff, Warden) (lls)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Deyot v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Ann Deyot
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Taycheedah Correctional Institution
Represented By:	Wisconsin Dept of Justice - 1983 Actions
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?