Wood v. Van Ru Credit Corporation et al
| Elizabeth Wood |
| Van Ru Credit Corporation, Colony Brands Inc and Silver Star Brands Inc |
| 2:2018cv01056 |
| July 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Milwaukee |
| David E Jones |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Elizabeth Wood. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Elizabeth Wood. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Colony Brands Inc, Silver Star Brands Inc, Van Ru Credit Corporation by Elizabeth Wood. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2872573) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Billing statement, #2 Exhibit B: Billing statement, #3 Exhibit C: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #4 Exhibit D: Billing statement, #5 Exhibit E: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Summons on Van Ru, #8 Summons on Colony, #9 Summons on Silver Star)(Eldridge, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
