Mollberg v. Advanced Call Center Technologies LLC
| Barbara Mollberg |
| Advanced Call Center Technologies LLC |
| 2:2018cv01210 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Milwaukee Office |
| Milwaukee |
| Nancy Joseph |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Barbara Mollberg. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph on 8/8/2018. The plaintiff's motion to stay the motion for class certification #3 and motion for relief from the Local Rules setting an automatic briefing schedule #3 are GRANTED. For administrative purposes, it is necessary that the Clerk terminate the plaintiff's motion for class certification #3 . However, this motion will be regarded as pending to serve its protective purpose under Damasco v. Clearwire Corp., 662 F.3d 891, 896 (7th Cir. 2011). (cc: all counsel) (llc)
|
| Summons Issued as to Advanced Call Center Technologies LLC. (blr) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Barbara Mollberg. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Barbara Mollberg. (Eldridge, Mark) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Advanced Call Center Technologies LLC by Barbara Mollberg. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2892004) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Billing statement, #2 Exhibit B: Letter from creditor, #3 Exhibit C: Billing statement, #4 Exhibit D: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mollberg v. Advanced Call Center Technologies LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Barbara Mollberg | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
| Represented By: | John D Blythin |
| Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
| Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Advanced Call Center Technologies LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
