Stenholtz v. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Dana Stenholtz
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill and Nancy Berryhill
Case Number: 2:2018cv01231
Filed: August 10, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Waukesha
Presiding Judge: William E Duffin
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2018 Filing 9 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; Commissioner of Social Security served on 9/7/2018. (blr)
September 10, 2018 Filing 8 Return of Service of Complaint by Certified Mail; US Attorney General served on 9/7/2018. (blr)
September 5, 2018 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (blr)
September 4, 2018 Filing 7 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Nancy Berryhill. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Pawlak, Brian)
August 31, 2018 Filing 6 Briefing Letter electronically transmitted to the parties: Plaintiff's brief due December 10, 2018; Defendant's response due Jnauary 22, 2019; Plaintiff's reply due February 6, 2019. (cc: all counsel) (blr)
August 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge William E Duffin GRANTING #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee. (cc: all counsel) (blr)
August 31, 2018 Transmit #1 Complaint and #5 Order via certified mail to the Commissioner of Social Security and the US Attorney General; US Attorney served electronically via CM/ECF. (blr)
August 13, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Dana Stenholtz. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Dreis, David)
August 10, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed Without Prepayment of the Filing Fee by Dana Stenholtz. (Dreis, David)
August 10, 2018 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Dana Stenholtz. (Dreis, David)
August 10, 2018 Filing 1 SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration filed by Dana Stenholtz (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dreis, David)
August 10, 2018 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge William E Duffin ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stenholtz v. Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dana Stenholtz
Represented By: David G Dreis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Represented By: Social Security Administration
Represented By: Brian E Pawlak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?