Bogacki v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc
Cheryl Bogacki |
Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc |
2:2018cv01254 |
August 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
Milwaukee Office |
Milwaukee |
J P Stadtmueller |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/11/2018. Parties to FILE a joint stipulation of dismissal by 11/13/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2018 at 9:30 AM has been VACATED. (cc: all counsel)(jm) |
Filing 7 STATUS REPORT (Jointly Filed By The Parties) by Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc. (Ortiz, Carlos) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 425, 517 E Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53202 before Judge J P Stadtmueller. Joint Rule 26 plan due 9/7/18. (cc: all counsel)(kmm) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc - Waiver sent on 8/16/2018. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Cheryl Bogacki. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark) |
Summons Issued as to Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc. (asc) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Cheryl Bogacki. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Cheryl Bogacki. (Eldridge, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc by Cheryl Bogacki. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2897915) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark) |
NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bogacki v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cheryl Bogacki | |
Represented By: | Mark A Eldridge |
Represented By: | Ben J Slatky |
Represented By: | John D Blythin |
Represented By: | Jesse Fruchter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc | |
Represented By: | Carlos A Ortiz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.