Bogacki v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc
Plaintiff: Cheryl Bogacki
Defendant: Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc
Case Number: 2:2018cv01254
Filed: August 14, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin
Office: Milwaukee Office
County: Milwaukee
Presiding Judge: J P Stadtmueller
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Judge J.P. Stadtmueller on 9/11/2018. Parties to FILE a joint stipulation of dismissal by 11/13/2018. Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2018 at 9:30 AM has been VACATED. (cc: all counsel)(jm)
September 11, 2018 Filing 7 STATUS REPORT (Jointly Filed By The Parties) by Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc. (Ortiz, Carlos)
August 20, 2018 Filing 6 NOTICE of Hearing: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 9/12/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 425, 517 E Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53202 before Judge J P Stadtmueller. Joint Rule 26 plan due 9/7/18. (cc: all counsel)(kmm)
August 17, 2018 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc - Waiver sent on 8/16/2018. (Eldridge, Mark)
August 15, 2018 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by Cheryl Bogacki. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Eldridge, Mark)
August 15, 2018 Summons Issued as to Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc. (asc)
August 14, 2018 Filing 3 MOTION to Certify Class (Damasco, Campbell-Ewald), Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION for Relief from memorandum, supporting documents, and automatic briefing requirements, Rule 7(h) Expedited Non-Dispositive MOTION to Stay the motion for class certification until the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference by Cheryl Bogacki. (Eldridge, Mark)
August 14, 2018 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Cheryl Bogacki. (Eldridge, Mark)
August 14, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT (class action) with Jury Demand; against Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc by Cheryl Bogacki. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2897915) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: letter from Defendant to Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons)(Eldridge, Mark)
August 14, 2018 NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge J P Stadtmueller ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Duffin to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website ;pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed (jcl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bogacki v. Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Bogacki
Represented By: Mark A Eldridge
Represented By: Ben J Slatky
Represented By: John D Blythin
Represented By: Jesse Fruchter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Retrieval Masters Creditors Bureau Inc
Represented By: Carlos A Ortiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?