Armeli v. Stryker Corporation
| Christa C Armeli |
| Stryker Corporation |
| 2:2018cv01735 |
| October 31, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin |
| Pamela Pepper |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Hearing: Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/2019 at 11:30 AM by telephone before Judge Pamela Pepper. Parties wishing to appear by phone may do so by calling the court's conference line at 888-557-8511 and using access code 4893665#. Rule 26 Discovery Plan due by 2/19/2019. (cc: all counsel)(cb) |
| Filing 9 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Stryker Corporation.(Lindner, Laura) |
Filing 8
TEXT ONLY ORDER signed by Judge Pamela Pepper on 11/20/2018 re #6 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File its Answer or Otherwise Plead. The court GRANTS the defendant's motion for an extension of time. The court ORDERS that the time for the defendant to file its answer or other responsive pleading to the plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED until the end of the day on December 21, 2018. Note: there is no document associated with this text only order. (cc: all counsel) (cb)
|
| Filing 7 DISCLOSURE Statement by Stryker Corporation. (Lindner, Laura) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Stryker Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Lindner, Laura) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura A Lindner on behalf of Stryker Corporation. Attorney(s) appearing: Laura A. Lindner (Lindner, Laura) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form filed by All Plaintiffs. (NOTICE: Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 73 this document is not viewable by the judge.) (Mihelich, Robert) |
| Summons Issued as to Stryker Corporation. (amb) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Issuance of Summons by Christa C Armeli (Mihelich, Robert) |
| Filing 2 DISCLOSURE Statement by Christa C Armeli. (Mihelich, Robert) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against Christa C Armeli by Christa C Armeli. ( Filing Fee PAID $400 receipt number 0757-2958252) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mihelich, Robert) |
| NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Judge Pamela Pepper ;Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days;the consent/refusal form is available on our website (jcl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Wisconsin Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Armeli v. Stryker Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Stryker Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Laura A Lindner |
| Represented By: | Stefanie Tripoli |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Christa C Armeli | |
| Represented By: | Robert M Mihelich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
